4.5 Article

Positive spiritual climate supports transformational leadership as means to reduce nursing burnout and intent to leave

期刊

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 804-813

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12994

关键词

burnout; nurse; ransformational leadership; spiritual climate; turnover intention

资金

  1. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province, China [KYCX18_2384]
  2. Program of International Academic Exchange for Postgraduate Students of Yangzhou University, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To explore the relationship between spiritual climate and transformational leadership, and examine their impact on nurses perceived emotional exhaustion and intentions to quit. Background Transformational leadership is known to have a significant positive effect on work environment and job satisfaction. Additionally, promoting spiritual climate amongst staff can benefit workers by increasing self-worth. The relationship between the two is unknown. Methods Nurse clinicians from 2 sites in the Jiangsu Province of China completed self-report questionnaires based on spiritual climate, emotional exhaustion, clinical leadership and Turnover Intention Scales. Mediation analysis was applied to evaluate impact of spiritual climate. Results Perceived positive spirituality amongst nurse clinicians reinforces transformational leadership to reduce emotional exhaustion (indirect effect of -0.089, p < .01). Burnout and intention to leave showed significantly positive correlation with lower levels of perceived spirituality (r = .545, p < .01). Conclusion Transformational leadership in the workplace can reduce nurses' burnout, and a positive spiritual climate increases meaningfulness in their work. This may help in nurse retention. Implications for Nursing Management Health care leaders must look beyond transformational leadership to maintain a positive and supportive clinical climate, and this may involve acknowledgement of nurses' spiritual needs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据