4.6 Article

Baseline Amino Acid Substitutions in the NS5A ISDR and PKR Binding Domain of Hepatitis C and Different Fibrosis Levels and Levels of Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Treated with DAAs

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v12030255

关键词

fibrosis levels; hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV; DAA; direct-acting antivirals; ISDR and PKR-bd

类别

资金

  1. Ministero della Salute, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Ricerca Corrente [80207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variations in the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) within the NS5A region were related to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of the study was to investigate a relationship between ISDR/PKR substitutions and their association with liver fibrosis or HCC development. A total of 316 patients infected with HCV and treated with DAAs were evaluated. HCV RNA was quantified and sequenced before treatment. The liver fibrosis stage was assessed by transient elastography and equalized to METAVIR scores. Multivariate analysis showed that >= 3 substitutions in ISDR and >= 6 in PKR-bd were significantly associated with advanced fibrosis. Advanced fibrosis was observed in patients with higher substitutions in ISDR and PKR-bd. A higher correlation between advanced fibrosis and a high frequency of >= 3 substitutions in ISDR and >= 6 in PKR-bd was observed in patients infected with genotype 2c. In addition, in a higher proportion of HCC patients, advanced fibrosis (40.4% vs. 88.2%; p < 0.001) and >= 6 substitutions in PKR-bd (15.4% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.01) was observed. In conclusion, a higher number of substitutions in ISDR and PKR-bd were associated with advanced liver fibrosis, suggesting a use of like predictors for progression in the liver damage. A significantly higher number of PKR-bd substitutions was observed in HCC patients; in particular, in patients infected with HCV genotype 2c.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据