4.2 Article

Comparative pharmacokinetics of quercitrin, astragalin, afzelin and taxifolin in plasma after oral administration of Polygonum orientale inflorescence in sham-operated and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury rats

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 50, 期 7, 页码 822-830

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00498254.2019.1700319

关键词

Chinese herb; Polygonum orientale inflorescence; pharmacokinetics; myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury rats; HPLC-MS; MS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81560630, U1812403, 81360664]
  2. Guizhou Science and Technology Department [[2019]5660/1439, [2018]4006, [2017]5601]
  3. Guiyang Science and Technology Bureau [[2017]30-29]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of quercitrin, astragalin, afzelin and taxifolin, four major bioactive components of Polygonum orientale inflorescence extracts, between sham-operated and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) rats. Rats were divided into two groups: MIRI model and sham-operated. The blood samples were collected according to the time schedule. The levels of quercitrin, astragalin, afzelin and taxifolin in the plasma at designated time points were determined using an HPLC-MS/MS method. Various pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from the plasma concentration versus time data using non-compartmental methods. After the administration of the Chinese herb Polygonum orientale inflorescence extracts, the C-max, AUC, as well as MRT, increased, while CL decreased, in MIRI model compared to the sham-operated animals. These results suggest that the pathological damage of ischemia-reperfusion had a significant impact on the pharmacological effects of Polygonum orientale inflorescence extracts on ischemic heart disease. The method had been successfully applied to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of quercitrin, astragalin, afzelin and taxifolin in rat plasma after the oral administration of Chinese herb Polygonum orientale inflorescence extracts in rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据