4.8 Article

Rate constants of hydroxyl radicals reaction with different dissociation species of fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides: Combined experimental and QSAR studies

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115083

关键词

Antibiotics; Dissociation forms; Hydroxyl radicals; Reaction rate constants; Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21661142001]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1801604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydroxyl radicals (center dot OH) initiated degradation is an important process governing fate of aquatic organic micropollutants (OMPs). However, rate constants for aqueous reaction of OMPs with center dot OH (k(OH)) are available only for a limited number of OMPs, which complicates fate assessment of OMPs. Furthermore, molecular structures of many OMPs contain ionizable groups, and the OMPs may dissociate into different anionic/cationic species with different reactivity towards center dot OH. Therefore, it is of importance to determine k(OH) of ionizable OMPs, and to develop quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting k(OH) of OMPs at different ionization forms. Herein k(OH) values of 9 fluoroquinolones (FQs) and 11 sulfonamides (SAS) at 3 dissociation forms (FQ(+/-)/FQ(+)/FQ(-), SA(0)/SA(+)/SA(-)) were determined by competition kinetics experiments. A QSAR model using theoretical molecular structural descriptors was subsequently developed. The QSAR model successfully corroborated previous experimental results, exhibited good statistical performance, and is capable to predict k(OH) for FQs and SAS with different dissociation forms at environmentally relevant pH conditions. As organic ions have rarely been included in previous QSAR studies, the newly developed model that covers both neutral molecules and ions is of significance for future QSAR development as well as fate assessment of ionizable OMPs. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据