4.8 Article

Regeneration and reuse of microbial extracellular polymers immobilised on a bed column for heavy metal recovery

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115472

关键词

Biosorption; Column; Extracellular polymeric substances; Ion exchange mechanism; Metal adsorption

资金

  1. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
  2. Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment
  3. European Union Regional Development Fund
  4. Province of Fryslan
  5. European Union [665874]
  6. research theme 'Natural flocculants'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) have gained increasing attention for various water treatment applications. In this study, EPS produced from nitrogen-limited glycerol/ethanol-rich wastewater were used to recover Cu2+ and Pb2+ from aqueous solutions. Continuous flow-through tests were conducted on a column packed with silica gel coated with polyethyleneimine, to which EPS were irreversibly attached as shown by optical reflectometry. These immobilised EPS excellently adsorbed Cu2+ and Pb2+, with 99.9% of influent metal adsorbed before the breakthrough points. Metal desorption was achieved with 0.1M HCl, with an average recovery of 86% for Cu2+ and 90% recovery for Pb2+. For the first time, we successfully showed the possibility to regenerate and reuse the immobilised EPS for five adsorption-desorption cycles (using Cu2+ as an example) with no reduction in the adsorbed amount at the breakthrough point (q(bp)). Based on the mass balance of the associated metal ions participating in the adsorption process, ion exchange was identified as the major mechanism responsible for Cu2+ and Pb2+ adsorption by EPS. The results demonstrate the potential of wastewater-produced EPS as an attractive and perhaps, cost-effective biosorbent for heavy metal removal (to trace effluent concentrations) and recovery (86-99%). (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据