4.6 Review

Challenge for the detection of microplastics in the environment

期刊

WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 5-15

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wer.1281

关键词

analytical method; contaminant; microplastics; qualitative analysis; quantitative analysis

资金

  1. Guangdong Yangfan Program [201635018] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Zhanjiang City [2018A02014] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Guangdong MEPP Fund [GDOE2019A52] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhanjiang) [ZJW-2019-07, ZJW-2019-08] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Industrial Development Special Funds of Dapeng New Area [KY20180202] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Guangdong Special Support Program [2017TQ04N706] Funding Source: Medline
  7. Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenzhen City [JCYJ20170818111719650] Funding Source: Medline
  8. Innovation and Development Project about Marine Economy Demonstration of Zhanjiang City [2017C8B1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microplastics, as an emerging environmental contaminant, have gained global attention, and the analytical methods including sample collection, separation, identification, and quantification need to be standardized; Digestion can facilitate the identification by removing organic matter; Combining microscope with analytical instruments can enhance the identification of microplastics.
As an emerging contaminant in the environment, microplastics have attracted worldwide attention. Although research methods on microplastics in the environment have been reported extensively, the data on microplastics obtained cannot be comparable due to different methods. In this work, we critically reviewed the analytical methods of microplastics, including sample collection, separation, identification, and quantification. Manta trawl and tweezers or cassette corers are used to collect water samples and sediments, respectively. For biota sample, internal organs need to be dissected and separated to obtain microplastics. Density differences are often used to separate microplastics from the sample matrix. Visual classification is one of the most common methods for identifying microplastics, and it can be better detected by combining it with other instruments. However, they are not suitable for detection nanoplastics, which may lead to underestimation of risk. The abundance of microplastics varies with the detection method. Thus, the analytical methods for microplastics need to be standardized as soon as possible. Meanwhile, new methods for analyzing nanoplastics are urgently needed. Practitioner points Sampling, separation, identification, and quantification are important procedures. The sampling and separation methods for microplastics need to be standardized. The organic matter can be removed by digestion to facilitate identification. Combine microscope with analytical instruments to better identify microplastics. There is still a challenge to quantification of smaller-sized plastic particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据