4.5 Article

Uncertainty and Personal Growth Through Positive Coping Strategies Among Chinese Parents of Children With Acute Leukemia

期刊

CANCER NURSING
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 205-212

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000279

关键词

Acute leukemia; Coping; Growth through uncertainty; Parental uncertainty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Having a child in the family with acute leukemia (AL) is a challenge for the parents and can trigger parental uncertainty. Through positive coping with uncertainty, parents can demonstrate positive psychological changes, including higher adaptability. Objectives: The purposes of this study were to measure uncertainty, coping strategies, and growth through uncertainty (GTU) and explore the relationships among them in parents of children with AL in China. Related factors of parental uncertainty were also explored. Methods: A descriptive and correlative design was used. Ninety-five parents of children with AL participated. Parental uncertainty, coping, and GTU were measured by the translated Chinese versions of scales originally developed by Mishel, McCubbin, and Mishel. Results: Parental uncertainty was found to be prevalent in parents of children with AL in China. It did not have a direct impact on GTU, but rather was mediated through coping. Coping was negatively associated with unpredictability (r = -0.225, P < .05), while positively associated with GTU (r = 0.391, P < .01). Conclusions: Through reordering of priorities of life events, parents acquired GTU during the process of their child's illness and treatment. Use of positive coping strategies by parents could help them to manage the stress associated with the unpredictability of child's illness and to promote a healthy maintenance of GTU. Implications for Practice: Nurses could assume a more active role in identifying sources and level of parental uncertainty, encouraging parents to stay optimistic, and promoting change in perceptions of uncertainty from danger to opportunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据