4.7 Article

CGCG clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult diffuse gliomas

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 375, 期 2, 页码 263-273

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.024

关键词

CGCG; Glioma; Management; Guideline

类别

资金

  1. Research Special Fund For Public Welfare Industry of Heath [201402008]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013BAI09B03, 2014BAI04B02]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863) [2012AA02A508]
  4. Beijing Science and Technology Plan [Z131100006113018]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91229121, 81201993, 81572701, 81372700]
  6. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program [2012DFA30470]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Chinese Glioma Cooperative Group (CGCG) Guideline Panel for adult diffuse gliomas provided recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The Panel covered all fields of expertise in neurooncology, i.e. neurosurgeons, neurologists, neuropathologists, neuroradiologists, radiation and medical oncologists and clinical trial experts. The task made clearer and more transparent choices about outcomes considered most relevant through searching the references considered most relevant and evaluating their value. The scientific evidence of papers collected from the literature was evaluated and graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and recommendations were given accordingly. The recommendations will provide a framework and assurance for the strategy of diagnostic and therapeutic measures to reduce complications from unnecessary treatment and cost. The guideline should serve as an application for all professionals involved in the management of patients with adult diffuse glioma and also as a source of knowledge for insurance companies and other institutions involved in the cost regulation of cancer care in China. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据