4.7 Article

MMGZ01, an anti-DLL4 monoclonal antibody, promotes nonfunctional vessels and inhibits breast tumor growth

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 372, 期 1, 页码 118-127

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.12.025

关键词

DLL4 monoclonal antibody; Notch; Breast cancer; Nonfunctional vessels; Antitumor; Angiogenesis

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC81102364, NSFC81273425, NSFC81473125]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20140675]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JKY2011025]
  4. Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines (China Pharmaceutical University) [JKGP201101]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence suggests that DLL4 (Delta-like 4)-Notch signaling plays a critical role in cell fate determination and differentiation in tissues. Blocking DLL4-Notch signaling results in inhibition of tumor growth, which is associated with increased nonfunctional vessels and poor perfusion in the tumor. We successfully generated a human DLL4 monoclonal antibody MMGZ01 that binds specifically to DLL4 to disrupt the interaction between DLL4 and Notch1. MMGZ01 showed high affinity to DLL4 to inhibit the DLL4-mediated human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) phenotype. Furthermore, MMGZ01 stimulated HUVEC vessel sprouting and tubule formation in vitro. In addition, MMGZ01 had a pronounced effect in promoting immature vessels and reduced breast cancer cell growth in vivo. Finally, MMGZ01 treatment inhibited the proliferation of breast cancer cells, induced tumor cell apoptosis, suppressed mammosphere formation, decreased CD44(+)/CD24(-) cell population, and reduced epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). These findings suggest that antagonism of the DLL4-Notch signaling pathway might provide a potential therapeutic approach for breast cancer treatment. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据