3.9 Article

The effect of substituting wheat bran with cumin seed meal on laying performance, egg quality characteristics and fatty acid profile in laying hens

期刊

VETERINARSKI ARHIV
卷 90, 期 1, 页码 47-56

出版社

UNIV ZAGREB VET FACULTY
DOI: 10.24099/vet.arhiv.0500

关键词

cumin seed meal; wheat bran; layers; egg quality; lipid peroxidation; fatty acids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of substituting wheat bran (WB) with cumin seed meal (CSM) on laying performance, egg quality characteristics and egg-yolk fatty acids profile in laying hens. A total of 180 Bovans hens at 55 weeks of age were divided randomly into three treatments. The CSM was incorporated into a standard corn- and soybean meal-based diet by replacing 0, 50, and 100% of WB [i.e.. 100% WB (control), 50% WB+50% CSM and 100% CSM] from 55 to 61 weeks of age. Body weight was measured at the beginning and end of the experiment. Feed intake, hen-day egg production and egg weight were recorded daily. At 61 weeks of age, 30 eggs were taken at random from each treatment group to determine the egg quality characteristics. Replacing 100% of WB by CSM did not affect body weight. however, hen-day egg production. egg weight and egg mass significantly increased, while feed conversion ratio significantly decreased (P<0.05). Haugh unit, shell thickness and yolk color significantly increased by CSM substitution in comparison with 100% WB. Plasma concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycendes, LDL-cholesterol and glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (GOT) significantly decreased by replacing WB with CSM, while, plasma HDL-cholesterol significantly increased. Furthermore, the liver malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration significantly decreased, while vitamin E, linoleic acid and alpha-linolenic acid significantly increased (P<0.05) due to CSM inclusion. Therefore, it could be concluded that substitution of WB with CSM could improve laying performance and egg quality characteristics, and reduce lipid peroxidation in laying hens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据