4.3 Article

Is green infrastructure a viable strategy for managing urban surface water flooding?

期刊

URBAN WATER JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 598-608

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1573062X.2019.1700286

关键词

Decision support; urban flooding; stormwater runoff; SuDS; water sensitive urban design

资金

  1. UK Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council through a Centre for Doctoral Training programme in Water Informatics Science and Engineering [EP/L016214/1]
  2. UK Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council through Safe & SuRe research fellowship [EP/K006924/1]
  3. UK Natural Environment Research Council SWEEP project [NE/P011217/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/K006924/1, EP/H015736/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. NERC [NE/P011217/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/P011217/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green infrastructure strategies are often cited as best practice for urban water management; however, limited research has been undertaken to compare intervention effectiveness during moderate to extreme intensity rainfall events which are typically responsible for surface water flooding. This research responds to this through applying a cellular automata-based rapid scenario screening framework to predict the flood management performance of green infrastructure strategies across an urban catchment in Melbourne City Centre (Australia). Key findings indicate an intensive application of green infrastructure could substantially reduce flood depth and velocity in the catchment but that residual risk remains, particularly during extreme flood events. The best performing intervention strategy in the study area was found to be catchment-wide decentralised rainwater capture. The research also evidences the utility of rapid scenario screening tools to complement existing flood modelling approaches through screening management strategies, exploring scenarios and engaging a wide range of multi-disciplinary stakeholders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据