4.7 Review

Interplay of antibiotic resistance and food-associated stress tolerance in foodborne pathogens

期刊

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 97-106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.006

关键词

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria; Food-associated stresses; Mechanisms; Cross protection; Food safety

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772079]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0400301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The discovery and use of antibiotics have produced tremendous benefits for human society, however, with the large-scale use of antibiotics in medicine, animal husbandry and other fields, more and more antibiotic-resistant bacteria have emerged. Since diseases caused by such antibiotic-resistant bacteria could require more drastic measures to treat, the emergence of such resistant bacteria in food has attracted much concern. Scope and approach: In this review, we summarized the interplay between antibiotic resistance and food-associated stress tolerance, and the hypothesized molecular mechanisms for the cross protection in bacteria. Key findings and conclusions: In this review, we found that some common food-associated stresses, such as cold, acid, osmosis and sanitizers could provide cross protection for bacteria against antibiotics. In turn, antibiotic resistance could also render bacteria more tolerant to food-associated stresses. Meanwhile, novel nonthermal technologies may more likely result in little or no difference in bacterial antibiotic resistance, and this can be an advantage over traditional sterilization methods. Several molecular mechanisms for the cross protection between antibiotics and food-associated stresses have been discussed in this review. General stress response (e.g., sigma factors and two-component system), SOS response, mutations, and other mechanisms have been proposed as strategies for bacteria acquisition of cross protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据