4.7 Article

A bi-objective timetable optimization model incorporating energy allocation and passenger assignment in an energy-regenerative metro system

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.01.001

关键词

Passenger assignment; Energy allocation; Irregular timetable; Block operation; Local search

资金

  1. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [71525002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71890972/71890970, 91846202, 71621001]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety [RCS2020ZZ001]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018RC010]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660373]
  6. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex passenger demand and electricity transmission processes in metro systems cause difficulties in formulating optimal timetables and train speed profiles, often leading to inefficiency in energy consumption and passenger service. Based on energy-regenerative technologies and smart-card data, this study formulates an optimization model incorporating energy allocation and passenger assignment to balance energy use and passenger travel time. The Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is applied and the core components are redesigned to obtain an efficient Pareto frontier of irregular timetables for maximizing the use of regenerative energy and minimizing total travel time. Particularly, a parallelogram-based method is developed to generate random feasible timetables; crossover and local-search-driven mutation operators are proposed relying on the graphic representations of the domain knowledge. The suggested approach is illustrated using real-world data of a bi-directional metro line in Beijing. The results show that the approach significantly improves regenerative energy use and reduces total travel time compared to the fixed regular timetable. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据