4.7 Review

Evaluating for-profit public benefit corporations as an additional structure for antibiotic development and commercialization

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 182-190

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.02.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Government (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority within the US Department of Health and Human Services)
  2. US Government (National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases within the US Department of Health and Human Services)
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. UK Government (Department of Health and Social Care)
  5. UK Government (Global AMR Innovation Fund)
  6. German Government (Federal Ministry of Education and Research)
  7. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  8. Social Innovation in Drug Resistance Program at Boston University
  9. School of Law at Boston University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While antibiotics are a key infrastructure underpinning modern medicine, evolution will continue to undermine their effectiveness, requiring continuous investment to sustain antibiotic effectiveness. The antibiotic R&D ecosystem is in peril, moving towards collapse. Key stakeholders have identified pull incentives such as Market Entry Rewards or subscription models as the key long-term solution. If substantial Market Entry Rewards or other pull incentives become possible, there is every reason to expect that for-profit companies will return to the antibiotic field. However, the political and financial will to develop such Market Entry Rewards or other similar incentives may be difficult to muster in the timeframes needed to prevent further diminishment of antibiotic research and development, especially if large drug companies are seen as substantial beneficiaries of these taxpayer-funded pull incentives. Bridging solutions are required from private actors in the interim. This article explores potential solutions led by private actors, including (1) traditional for-profit companies; (2) non-profit enterprises; and (3) public benefit corporations with lower profit expectations, akin to a public utility. All face similar commercial struggles, but nonprofits and public benefit corporations can accept lower profit expectations and might be more politically attractive recipients of pull incentives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据