4.6 Article

Rivaroxaban in patients with mechanical heart valves: A pilot study

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 1-6

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.12.005

关键词

Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use; Heart valve prosthesis; Thromboembolism; Blood coagulation/drug effects

资金

  1. St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
  2. Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with mechanical heart valves are still not eligible for treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to conduct a proof-of-principle study investigating the anti-Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban as antithrombotic treatment in patients with recent mechanical aortic valve replacement. Materials and methods: Low-risk patients scheduled for elective mechanical aortic valve replacement were treated with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (OD) in a prospective cohort study, started on day 3 postoperatively and given for 6 months. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT02128841). Results: Ten patients were included (median age, 48; range 39 to 60). Indication was aortic valve stenosis in 6 patients, aortic root aneurysm with severe aortic valve regurgitation in 3 patients, and mixed stenosis/regurgitation in 1 patient. Neither thromboembolic nor bleeding events were observed, and no patient died. Absence of valve thrombosis was demonstrated in all patients. On day 7, median D-dimers were 2723 mu g/L (inter-quartile range [IQR] 1672, 5695 mu g/L), median TAT levels were 4.5 mu g/L (IQR 4.1, 5.6 mu g/L); and median peak thrombin generation was 150 nM (IQR 91, 183). On day 90, median D-dimers were 426 mu g/L (IQR 278, 569), median TAT levels were 2.7 mu g/L (IQR 2.2, 3.1), and median peak thrombin generation were 66 nM (IQR 62, 87). Conclusions: Rivaroxaban 20 mg OD was safe and effective in a pilot study of 10 low risk patients with mechanical aortic heart valve. Our results justify larger studies investigating the application of anti-Xa inhibitors in patients with mechanical heart valves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据