4.7 Article

Vibrations of composite thin-walled beams with arbitrary curvature - a unified approach

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106473

关键词

Thin-walled composite beam (TWCB); Arbitrary curvature; Vibrational analysis; Frenet-Serret; Isogeometric analysis (IGA)

资金

  1. CONACYT/Fondo de Sustentabilidad Energetica through project P19 of the Mexican Centre for Innovation in Wind Energy (CEMIE Eolico)
  2. Energy and Climate Change Group at the School of Engineering and Sciences at Tecnologico de Monterrey
  3. SCyT de la Universidad Tecnologica Nacional
  4. CONICET (Argentina)
  5. CONACYT (Mexico)
  6. Universidad Autonoma De Queretaro

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a unified theory for the vibrational analysis of thin-walled composite beams (TWCB) with arbitrary planar axial curvature, variable cross section, and general composite material layup, allowing for the accurate modelling of a large class of composite beams with an accuracy normally achievable only through shell type finite-element (FE) models, but at a fraction of the numerical cost. The kinematic description is based on the Frenet-Serret frame field, providing a transparent path for transforming the equations of motion from rectilinear to curved TWCB while fully accounting for curvature gradient terms, thereby allowing for the treatment of highly curved geometries. Additional innovations include the use of a novel formulation increasing the accuracy for cases with significant axial-bending-torsional structural coupling, as well as a computationally efficient Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) formulation. The new method has been applied to modal and transient analysis of several test cases where conventional TWCB models are found to yield limited accuracy. The results obtained are almost indistinguishable from those obtained with a full-sized shell-based FE model, at a computational cost which is about two orders-of-magnitude smaller.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据