4.4 Article

Hanessian-Hullar reaction in the synthesis of highly substituted trans-3,4-dihydroxypyrrolidines: Rhamnulose iminosugar mimics inhibit α-glucosidase

期刊

TETRAHEDRON
卷 76, 期 I, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2019.130758

关键词

Iminosugars; Sugar mimics; Rhamnosidase inhibitors; Glucosidase inhibitors; Deoxysugars; Pyrrolidine synthesis; Benzylidene acetals; Hanessian Hullar reaction

资金

  1. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI) [JP17K08362]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M011321/1]
  3. University of Kagawa
  4. Xunta de Galicia (Centro Singular de Investigacion de Galicia) [ED431B 2018/13, CN2011/037, GRC2014/040]
  5. European Union (European Regional Development Fund-ERDF)
  6. BBSRC [BB/M011321/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The key step in the syntheses of highly substituted trans-3,4-dihydroxypyrrolidines is introduction of bromide by stereospecific and regiospecific Hanessian-Hullar reactions; benzylidene lactones of L-rhamnonolactone and 6-deoxy-this should be small unnpercase D not L why can I not correct this-gulonolactone allow introduction of N at C2 with inversion or retention of configuration. Initially a protecting group, the benzylidene acetal then provides a bromide at C5 to allow formation of the pyrrolidine ring. With silyl protecting groups, bromide was introduced at C5 with inversion of configuration whereas benzoyl protection gave a mixture of retention and inversion, indicative of neighbouring group participation in a Hanessian-Hullar reaction. Four stereoisomeric pyrrolidines - iminosugar mimics of sand beta-L-rhamnulose and alpha- and beta-6-deoxy-D-sorbose were prepared. Only the alpha-L-rhamnulose mimic showed moderate inhibition of rhamnosidase but some were good inhibitors of alpha-glucosidases; none inhibited rhamnose isomerase and they had a small effect as synthetic inducers of the rhamnose catabolic operon in E. coli. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据