4.6 Article

From Breakup of Nuna to Assembly of Rodinia: A Link Between the Chinese Central Tianshan Block and Fennoscandia

期刊

TECTONICS
卷 38, 期 12, 页码 4378-4398

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018TC005471

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0601205]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633171]
  3. CPSF-CAS Joint Foundation for Excellent Postdoctoral Fellows [2017LH019]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China [902101001, 41573025, 41711530147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition from breakup of Nuna (or Columbia, 2.0-1.6 Ga) to assembly of Rodinia (1.0-0.9 Ga) is investigated by means of U-Pb and Lu-Hf data of detrital zircons from three Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the Central Tianshan Block (CTB), NW China. These data yield six age peaks around 1.0, 1.13, 1.34, 1.4-1.6, 1.75, and 2.6 Ga. Few zircons are detected between 2.0 and 2.5 Ga. The Paleoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic detrital zircons have Hf isotopic compositions (-22.1 to +13.0) similar to those of coeval magmatic rocks in the CTB, indicating a proximal provenance. These results, together with the geological evidence and the presence of 1.4 Ga orogenic granitoids in the CTB, rule out most cratons as the CTB sources but support a Fennoscandia ancestry. Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopic compositions from the CTB and Fennoscandia suggest that from 1.8 to 1.4 Ga, the epsilon(Hf)(t) values increased toward more positive values, consistent with an exterior orogen characteristic that the lower crust was replaced by a juvenile arc crust. In contrast, from 1.4 to 0.9 Ga, zircon epsilon(Hf)(t) values decreased to more negative values, reflecting an interior orogen, characterized by enhanced contribution of recycled crustal material from collided continental fragments. This marked shift most likely reflected a transition from breakup of Nuna to assembly of Rodinia, accomplished by a transformation from an exterior orogen to an interior one.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据