4.7 Article

Preparation of monodisperse porous polymeric ionic liquid microspheres and their application as stationary phases for HPLC

期刊

TALANTA
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120462

关键词

Polymeric ionic liquid; Seeded emulsion polymerization; Porous microspheres; High performance liquid chromatography; Mix-mode separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51903130, 21675091, 21574072, 21874078]
  2. Taishan Young Scholar Program of Shandong Province [tsqn20161027]
  3. Major Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Province [2018CXGC1407]
  4. Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province [2016GGX102028, 2016GGX102039, 2017GGX20111]
  5. People's Livelihood Science and Technology Project of Qingdao [166257nsh, 173378nsh]
  6. Innovation Leader Project of Qingdao [168325zhc]
  7. Program of Source Innovation of Applied Basic Research in Qingdao City [171124jch]
  8. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017PB012]
  9. Postdoctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Qingdao
  10. First Class Discipline Project of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent decades, ionic liquid-modified packing materials as stationary phases of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have attracted widespread attention due to their comprehensive properties. In this work, monodisperse porous polymeric ionic liquid microspheres were directly prepared using a seeded emulsion polymerization method and applied as stationary phase of HPLC. The effects of porogen, monomer and crosslinker on the properties of porous P(IL-DVB) microspheres were investigated in detail. Porous P(IL-DVB) microspheres with good stability, monodispersity and relatively high specific surface area were selected as stationary phase to successfully separate benzene and its homologues, and nucleosides and alkaloids under reversed phase chromatography (RPLC) mode and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) mode, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据