4.7 Article

Direct analysis in real time accurate mass spectrometry determination of bisphenol A in thermal printing paper

期刊

TALANTA
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.06.086

关键词

Bisphenol A; Thermal printing paper; Ambient ionization; Direct analysis in real time; Mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Xunta de Galicia, Spanish Government
  2. EU FEDER program [GRC-ED431C 2017/36, CTQ2015-68660-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contact with thermal printing paper is a relevant source of dermal exposure to unbonded bisphenol A (EPA). In order to limit this exposure route, the European Union has introduced a drastic reduction in the maximum allowed concentration of BPA in thermal paper produced after beginning of year 2020. This study investigates the suitability of direct analysis in real time (DART), combined with accurate mass spectrometry, as a faster alternative to chromatography-based methods for the quantitative determination of BPA, and three analogues species, in receipts and tickets usually printed on thermal paper. The ionization efficiency of these compounds is evaluated under different conditions, and the effect of instrumental parameters of the DART source in the observed responses is discussed. The yield of the DART desorption-ionization process was greatly improved when compounds are previously converted into their acetyl derivatives; thereafter, the temperature of electronically excited helium atoms was the most relevant of the evaluated instrumental parameters. Under optimized conditions, the reported method provided recoveries in the range from 90 to 110%, a limit of quantification of 0.004% (w:w), well below the maximum concentration established after 2020 for EPA (0.02%, w:w), and permitted to perform duplicate determinations of each sample extract with a response time around 1 min. The accuracy of BPA levels found in non-spiked samples was confirmed using GC-EI-MS as reference technique. BPA was systematically noticed in the processed samples with concentrations ranging from 0.005% to more than 6%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据