4.7 Article

A feasible image-based colorimetric assay using a smartphone RGB camera for point-of-care monitoring of diabetes

期刊

TALANTA
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120211

关键词

Urinary glucose; Smartphone; Color fading; RGB analysis; HRP-H2O2-TMB

资金

  1. West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences [2018XBZG_XBQNXZ_A_005]
  2. Biological Resources Programme, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-BRP-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urinary glucose determination using a glucose test strip is simple and convenient in daily self-monitoring of diabetes. However, diabetic patients exhibit acquired impaired color vision (ICV), which results in the inability to discriminate between hues. Even with the assistance of a color chart, it is still not easy for these patients to read the urinary glucose results with the naked eye. In this study, a smartphone camera using an image-based colorimetric detection method was successfully developed for quantitative analysis of urine glucose. A horseradish peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide-3,3'5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (HRP-H2O2-TMB) system was optimized for a reliable and gradual color fading process via a glucose oxidase (GOD) catalyzed oxidation reaction. The color changes of the peroxidase-H2O2 enzymatic reactions in the 96-well microplate were captured by a smartphone RGB camera with subsequent detection of red, green, and blue (RGB) intensities decreasing at each image pixel. The highly quantitative relationships between the glucose concentrations and the color characteristic values of the blue channel of the captured images were successfully established. The high accuracy of this method was demonstrated in urine glucose measurements with a linear response over the 0.039 mg mL(-1) to 10.000 mg mL(-1) glucose concentration range and a 0.009 mg mL(-1) detection limit. The method has great potential as a point-of need platform for diabetic patients with defective color vision and features high accuracy and low cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据