4.2 Review

Steroid analysis by ion mobility spectrometry

期刊

STEROIDS
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2019.108531

关键词

Steroid analysis; Ion mobility spectrometry; Liquid chromatography

资金

  1. National Science Foundation, Division of Chemistry, through the Chemical Measurement and Imaging Program [1507989]
  2. Maximizing Investigators' Research Award [R35GM128926]
  3. Molecular Mechanisms of Disease Predoctoral Training Program [T32GM107001]
  4. Nebraska Center for Integrated Biomolecular Communication [P20GM113126]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Chemistry [1507989] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steroids are an important biomolecule class for analysis due to their promise as biomarkers for various diseases and their abuse as performance enhancers in sports. Current analytical methods, including chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, fall short of being able to confidently analyze steroids, partly due to the large number of steroid isomers. Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), a gas-phase ion separator, has shown potential for steroid analysis both in conjunction with liquid chromatography (LC) and as a stand-alone technique. This review will examine the current literature on IMS analysis of steroids. Analysis by LC-IMS will include examination of steroids and steroid glucuronides in human urine and serum samples for enhanced signal-to-noise ratios and higher confidence of identification. The stand-alone IMS analysis will examine the use of derivatization of steroids and formation of multimers to enhance resolution for steroid isomers analysis, where both methods have been shown to greatly increase the separation of steroid isomer species. However, these methods have not been applied to biological mixtures to assess their applicability to medical and forensic applications, which should be a future direction of this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据