4.5 Article

Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Modulate BV2 Microglial M1/M2 Polarization by Producing Glial Cell-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

期刊

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 714-727

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2019.0235

关键词

neuroinflammation; adipose-derived stem cell; glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor; microglial polarization; PI3K; AKT signaling pathway

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31300921]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [S2013040016710]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroinflammation is associated with the pathogenesis of all types of neurological disease, in which microglial cells play a critical role. In response to disturbances in the microenvironment, microglia (MG) become activated and differentiate into either an M1 phenotype, which has a proinflammatory damaging effect, or an M2 phenotype, which plays an anti-inflammatory and reparative role. Thus, modulating microglial polarization is a suitable strategy to treat neuroinflammatory disorders. Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a neurotrophic mediator that exerts neuroprotective effects during neurological diseases. In this study, we predicted that adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) could produce GDNF and investigated the effects of GDNF on microglial M1/M2 polarization. Furthermore, we determined whether GDNF modulates microglial activation and polarization via the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway. We found that the secretion of inflammatory cytokines in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated MG was downregulated, whereas the anti-inflammatory mediators in interleukin-4-stimulated MG were upregulated obviously, following pretreatment with ADSCs or GDNF. In addition, GDNF produced by ADSCs inhibited the MG M1 phenotype and promoted the M2 phenotype by upregulating the PI3K/ATK pathway. These results reveal that GDNF produced by ADSCs might be useful for the regulation of neuroinflammatory disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据