4.6 Article

High-efficiency multi-crystalline black silicon solar cells achieved by additive assisted Ag-MACE

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 176-184

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.045

关键词

Multi-crystalline silicon solar cell; Diamond wire sawn; Metal-assisted chemical etching; Uniform textures; Additive

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1500500, 2018YFB1500200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51602340, 51702355, 61804108]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality [4192064]
  4. JKW Project [31512060106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is important for uniform texture on crystallites with different orientation of diamond wire sawn multi-crystalline silicon solar cells by Ag metal-assisted chemical etching method (Ag-MACE). In this paper, an additive was adopted to make the nanostructures on crystallites with different orientation of multi-crystalline silicon wafers with roughly the same depth and diameter. This additive contains biological enzymes, which are macromolecular proteins with specific catalytic functions. The uniform texture produced by the additive is demonstrated to be helpful in improving the cell performance in terms of surface morphology, reflectivity, effective minority carrier lifetime, auger recombination rate, internal quantum efficiency and external quantum efficiency measurements as well as electroluminescence spectra characterizations. The chemical mechanism of additive assisted etching reaction during the texturing process was discussed. Finally, mass-produced multi-crystalline silicon solar cells made by Ag-MACE with the additive achieve a maximum efficiency and average efficiency of 19.56%, and 19.24%, respectively, which were 0.65% and 0.64% absolutely higher than that without the additive. Moreover, the effective minority carrier lifetime and auger recombination rate of the former was nearly twice and a third of that of the latter respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据