4.4 Article

Stiffness and strength characteristics of demolition waste, glass and plastics in railway capping layers

期刊

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 2238-2253

出版社

JAPANESE GEOTECHNICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2019.12.009

关键词

Demolition waste; Recovered plastic; Railway capping layer; Sustainable subballast; Resilient modulus; Multistage triaxial test

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Advanced Technologies in Rail Track Infrastructure [IC170100006]
  2. Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increased generation of demolition waste has led to the successful implementation of its utilization in civil engineering projects. The combination of recycled aggregates and supplementary materials can potentially improve the quality of geomaterials when constructing alternative railway capping layers. In this research, two types of demolition waste, namely, Recycled Concrete Aggregates (RCA) and Crushed Brick (CB), were studied in comparison to two Conventional Capping Materials (CCMs), which are currently used for railway track construction. Recycled Glass (RG) and Mixed Recovered Plastic (MRP) were also blended with RCA to assess their performance. All the materials and mixtures were evaluated in terms of both stiffness and strength. A new Repeated Load Triaxial (RLT) testing protocol was introduced based on the stress induced in the capping layers to determine the stiffness of the materials. A comparison was made among the current resilient modulus prediction models to find a model that would better fit the results for the demolition waste and mixtures. Multistage triaxial tests were also conducted to determine the strength, friction, stiffness and energy absorption capacity of the materials. It was found from this research study that RCA, CB and mixtures of RCA with RG and MRP have equivalent or higher levels of stiffness and strength than CCMs and are suitable alternatives for sustainable railway capping layer construction. (C) 2020 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Geotechnical Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据