4.8 Article

Ultrasensitive immunochromatographic assay for the simultaneous detection of five chemicals in drinking water

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 445-453

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.12.004

关键词

Gold nanoparticle immunochromatographic strip; Simultaneous detection; Microcystin-leucine-arginine; Chloramphenicol; Testosterone

资金

  1. Key Programs from MOST [2012AA06A303, 2012BAK17B10, 2012BAD29B04]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, MOF and MOE [2013KJ31, BE2013613, BE2013611, 201310128, 201310135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we describe the development of a multicomponent lateral-flow assay based on an antibody-antigen reaction for the rapid and simultaneous detection of trace contaminants in water, including a heavy metal, algal toxin, antibiotic, hormone, and pesticide. The representative analytes chosen for the study were lead (Pb(II), microcystin-leucine-arginine (MC-LR), chloramphenicol (CAP), testosterone (T), and chlorothalonil (CTN). Five different antigens were immobilized separately in five test lines on a nitrocellulose membrane. The monoclonal antibodies specifically recognized the corresponding antigens, and there was no cross-reactivity between the antibodies in the detection assay. Samples or standards containing the five analytes were preincubated with the freeze-dried colloidal-gold-labeled monoclonal antibody conjugates to improve the sensitivity of the assay. The results were obtained within 20 min with a paper-based sensor. The cut-off values for the strip test were 4 ng/mL for Pb(II), 1 ng/mL for MC-LR, 0.1 ng/mL for CAP, 5 ng/mL for T, and 5 ng/mL for CTN. The assay was evaluated using spiked water samples, and the accuracy and reproducibility of the results were good. In summary, this lateral-flow device provides an effective and rapid method for the onsite detection of multiple contaminants in water samples, with no treatment or devices required. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据