4.4 Article

Histone deacetylase 2 regulates doxorubicin (Dox) sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells by targeting ABCB1 transcription

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 77, 期 3, 页码 613-621

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-016-2979-9

关键词

HDAC2; CRC; ABCB1; AP-1; Doxorubicin

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan [2015KYB217]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) have been shown to regulate cell cycle, differentiation, and apoptosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, while their roles in drug sensitivity remain unclear. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the effects of HDAC2 on drug resistance of CRC cells. We measured the expression of class I HDACs (HDAC1, 2, 3, 8) in CRC and human normal colonic epithelial cells. Additionally, we inhibited HDAC2 via siRNA or overexpressed it via pcDNA/HDAC2 transfection to evaluate its roles in doxorubicin (Dox) sensitivity. Our present study showed HDAC2 was significantly increased in CRC cell lines as compared to human normal colonic epithelial cells. Silencing of HDAC2 can obviously enhance the sensitivity of HCT-116 and SW480 cells to dDox. Further, knockdown of HDAC2 can significantly (p < 0.05) downregulate the expression of ABCB1, while not ABCG2, ABCC1, ABCA1, or ABCC2. Inhibition of HDAC2 decreased ABCB1 promoter activities and the phosphorylation of c-fos and c-Jun, which can directly interact with the ABCB1 promoter and then promote its transcription. Overexpression of HDAC2 by pcDNA/HDAC2 transfection significantly increased the sensitivity of CRC cells to Dox and upregulated the levels of P-gp, p-c-fos, and p-c-Jun. Our data revealed that HDAC2 can regulate Dox sensitivity of CRC cells by targeting ABCB1 transcription. It suggested that HDAC2 might be an important target for CRC therapy. Further, the combination of HDAC2-specific inhibitor and anticancer drugs including Dox might be an efficiency approach to elevate the treatment outcome of CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据