4.7 Article

Ultra-high efficient pH induced selective removal of cationic and anionic dyes from complex coexisted solution by novel amphoteric biocomposite microspheres

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115922

关键词

Dyestuff wastewater treatment; Amphoteric carboxymethyl chitosan/gelatin microspheres (CCGMs); pH induced selective removal; Adsorption mechanism

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFCO204500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578239, 21878099, 51608203]
  3. Scientific Research Projects of Shanghai, China [17DZ1202802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The substandard discharge of highly toxic dyestuff wastewater will pose a serious threat to the environment and human beings, even causing unimaginable irreversible damages. In the current study, novel amphoteric carboxymethyl chitosan/gelatin microspheres (CCGMs), synthesized by a facile inverse suspension route with two-step successive crosslinking process, were evaluated as a potential adsorbent for high efficient pH induced selective removal of azo-dyes. The as-prepared CCGMs were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Various influential factors such as solution pH, temperature, and contact time were employed to ascertain the optimal condition for representative azo-dyes adsorption, including methyl orange (MO) and methylene blue (MB). The maximal adsorption of MO and MB on the CCGMs at pH values of 3 and 11 were 383.142 mg g(-1) and 584.795 mg g(-1), respectively. The adsorption mechanism were demonstrated as the synergistic effect of electrostatic interaction and pi-pi stacking between dyes and CCGMs. Besides, the outstanding and stable regeneration of as-prepared CCGMs were also verified with five consecutive recycling. Thus, the newly developed CCGMs could be a highly promising candidate for dyestuff wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据