4.7 Article

Development of a xurographically fabricated miniaturized low-cost, high-performance microbial fuel cell and its application for sensing biological oxygen demand

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 304, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127432

关键词

Microbial fuel cell (MFC); Xurographic fabrication; BOD biosensor; Fast response; Wastewater

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0400709]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Tianjin Binhai New Area [BHXQKJXM-PT-ZJSHJ-2017001]
  3. China Scholarships Council [201806200149]
  4. Canada First Research Excellence Program through the Global Water Futures Project [346989]
  5. Canada Research Chairs Program [950-231089]
  6. Ontario Research Fund [RE-WR-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid quantification of biological oxygen demand (BOD) plays an important role in environmental management, for instance, wastewater treatment. This study used xurographic fabrication technology to rapidly fabricate a low cost miniaturized microbial fuel cell (MFC) and demonstrated its suitability to measure BOD. The miniaturized sensor could be fabricated in 10 min with low cost of $0.5 U.S. per device. The reaction volume was designed to be 1.8 mu L to obtain faster response time. The sensor was tested using sodium acetate (NaAc) as a model BOD analyte. It could response to a wide range of BOD concentration between 20 and 490 mg/L which would cover the majority range of wastewater BOD concentration in a wastewater treatment plant. The response time of this microsensor was 1.1 min which was significantly shorter than other conventional methods for BOD measurements (5 days). This study demonstrated that the use of xurographic methods to fabricate MFCs could enable rapid fabrication of microsensors to measure BOD in a rapid manner. This study also identified the potential of the sensor for application in wastewater treatment plants to monitor BOD and provide guidance for controlling treatment processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据