4.8 Article

Highly sensitive and specific colorimetric detection of cancer cells via dual-aptamer target binding strategy

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 1-6

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.05.044

关键词

Colorimetric detection; Cytosensor; Dual-aptamer; Nanomaterial; Breast cancer cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21105095, 211900040]
  2. State Key Instrument Developing Special Project of Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012YQ170003]
  3. Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [YZ201203]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province, China [20130101117JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simple, rapid, sensitive and specific detection of cancer cells is of great importance for early and accurate cancer diagnostics and therapy. By coupling nanotechnology and dual-aptamer target binding strategies, we developed a colorimetric assay for visually detecting cancer cells with high sensitivity and specificity. The nanotechnology including high catalytic activity of PtAuNP and magnetic separation & concentration plays a vital role on the signal amplification and improvement of detection sensitivity. The color change caused by small amount of target cancer cells (10 cells/mL) can be clearly distinguished by naked eyes. The dual-aptamer target binding strategy guarantees the detection specificity that large amount of non-cancer cells and different cancer cells (10(4) cells/mL) cannot cause obvious color change. A detection limit as low as 10 cells/mL with detection linear range from 10 to 10(5) cells/mL was reached according to the experimental detections in phosphate buffer solution as well as serum sample. The developed enzymefree and cost effective calorimetric assay is simple and no need of instrument while still provides excellent sensitivity, specificity and repeatability, having potential application on point-of-care cancer diagnosis. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据