4.7 Article

Enzyme-triggered inner filter effect on the fluorescence of gold nanoclusters for ratiometric detection of mercury(II) ions via a dual-signal responsive logic

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
卷 302, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2019.111794

关键词

Ratiometric fluorescence; Gold nanocluster; Enzyme inhibition; Inner filter effect; Mercury(II) ions analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675065, 61901193]
  2. Innovation/Entrepreneurship Program of Jiangsu Province
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160490]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein a novel ratiometric fluorescence strategy based on enzyme-triggered inner filter effect (IFE) was described to sensitively detect mercury ions (Hg2+) for the first time by using L-proline-protected gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) and 2,3-diaminophenazine (DAP) as IFE fluorophore and absorber. The IFE was derived from the overlap between the emission band of AuNCs and absorption band of DAP and confirmed by fluorescence lifetime decay tests. Based on IFE principle and ratiometric strategy, lactase (LACC)-catalyzed o-phenylenediamine (OPD) oxidation was utilized to produce DAP, whereas the activity of LACC can be monitored by Hg2+. In this way, the existence of Hg2+ could depress the emission of DAP while restore that of AuNCs, achieving the dual signal response of Hg2+. and their emission intensity ratio was dependent on the concentration of Hg2+. Under the optimized detection conditions, the linear range for Hg2+ determination was from 0.8 to 35 mu M with a detection limit of 0.27 mu M. Besides, it was successfully applied to the analysis of tap water and Yangtze river water. Our strategy can be used to assess the activity of LACC, and it also provided a novel way to construct other enzyme-based biosensors. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据