4.6 Article

Adaptive Robust Unscented Kalman Filter for AUV Acoustic Navigation

期刊

SENSORS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20010060

关键词

AUV acoustic navigation; unscented Kalman filter; adaptive filter; Sage-Husa filter; robust estimation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0501701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41874032, 41731069, 41574013, 41931076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) acoustic navigation is challenged by unknown system noise and gross errors in the acoustic observations caused by the complex marine environment. Since the classical unscented Kalman filter (UKF) algorithm cannot control the dynamic model biases and resist the influence of gross errors, an adaptive robust UKF based on the Sage-Husa filter and the robust estimation technique is proposed for AUV acoustic navigation. The proposed algorithm compensates the system noise by adopting the Sage-Husa noise estimation technique in an online manner under the condition that the system noise matrices are kept as positive or semi positive. In order to control the influence of gross errors in the acoustic observations, the equivalent gain matrix is constructed to improve the robustness of the adaptive UKF for AUV acoustic navigation based on Huber's equivalent weight function. The effectiveness of the algorithm is verified by the simulated long baseline positioning experiment of the AUV, as well as the real marine experimental data of the ultrashort baseline positioning of an underwater towed body. The results demonstrate that the adaptive UKF can estimate the system noise through the time-varying noise estimator and avoid the problem of negative definite of the system noise variance matrix. The proposed adaptive robust UKF based on the Sage-Husa filter can further reduce the influence of gross errors while adjusting the system noise, and significantly improve the accuracy and stability of AUV acoustic navigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据