4.6 Article

Structural Damage Diagnosis-Oriented Impulse Response Function Estimation under Seismic Excitations

期刊

SENSORS
卷 19, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s19245413

关键词

impulse response function estimation; multiple excitations; structural damage diagnosis; inverse problem

资金

  1. China Earthquake Administration's Science for Earthquake Resilience Project [XH204702]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project [2018B020207011]
  3. 111 Project of Ministry of Education of China
  4. Bureau of Foreign Expert of China [B18062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impulse response function (IRF) is an ideal structural damage index for the identification of structural damage associated with changes in modal properties. However, IRFs from multiple excitations applied at different degrees-of-freedoms jointly contribute to the dynamic response, and their estimation is often underdetermined. Although some efforts have been devoted to the estimation of IRF for a structure under single excitation, the case under multiple excitations has not been fully investigated yet. The estimation of IRF under multiple excitations is generally an ill-conditioned inverse problem such that an incorrect or non-feasible solution is common, preventing its application to damage detection. This work explores this problem by introducing dimensionality reduction transformation matrices relating two sets of IRFs of a structure with discussions on the performance of the non-unique transformation matrices. Then, the extraction of IRF via wavelet-based and Tikhonov regularization-based methods are compared. Finally, a numerical study with a truss structure is conducted to validate the estimation of the IRFs and to demonstrate their applicability for damage detection under seismic excitations. Both the damage locations and severity are accurately identified, indicating the proposed methodology can enable the IRFs estimation under multiple excitations for successful damage detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据