4.7 Article

Low intensity white light-emitting diodes (LED) application to delay senescence and maintain quality of postharvest pakchoi (Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis (L.) Makino var. communis Tsen et Lee)

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109060

关键词

White LED light; Antioxidant enzyme; Chlorophyll metabolism; Gene expression

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0400901]
  2. China Agriculture Research System Project [CARS-23]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772022]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [6182016]
  5. Young Investigator Fund of Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences [201709]
  6. Special innovation ability construction fund of Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences [20180404, 20180705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effect of white LED irradiation on quality, antioxidant, chlorophyll-related enzyme activity and gene expression were evaluated in pakchoi. Results indicated that white LED irradiation (10 mu mol m(-2)s(-1)) significantly suppressed the changes in sensory evaluation, respiration rate, and malondialdehyde content, and also maintained higher chlorophyll and vitamin C content in harvested pakchoi stored at 20 degrees C. Furthermore, LED treatment maintained the levels of gene expression and enzyme activity of peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase, inhibited the activity and expression of several enzymes (chlorophyllase, chlorophyll-degrading peroxidase, Mg-dechelatase, pheophytinase) and chlorophyll-degrading genes (BrChlase1, BrChlase2, and BrPPH), and increased the expression of the chlorophyll synthetase gene, BrHEMAL Collectively, the results demonstrate that LED treatment represents an effective method for delaying senescence and maintaining the quality of pakchoi by enhancing the activity and relative gene expression level of antioxidant enzymes and regulating chlorophyll metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据