4.7 Review

Environmental exposure to microplastics: An overview on possible human health effects

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 702, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455

关键词

Microplastics; Nanoplastics; Human health risks; Marine litter; Toxicology

资金

  1. FCT/MEC (PIDDAC) [IF/00407/2013/CP1162/CT0023]
  2. FCT/MCTES [UID/AMB/50017/2019]
  3. Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) through POCH funds [PD/BD/135581/2018]
  4. European Social Fund
  5. Portuguese National Funds from MEC
  6. national funds (OE), through FCT
  7. FEDER, through COMPETE2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (POCI) [POCI-1-0145-FEDER-028740]
  8. national funds (OE), through FCT/MCTES [POCI-1-0145-FEDER-028740]
  9. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [IF/00407/2013/CP1162/CT0023] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microplastics are ubiquitous environmental contaminants leading to inevitable human exposure. Even so, little is known about the effects of microplastics in human health. Thus, in this work we review the evidence for potential negative effects of microplastics in the human body, focusing on pathways of exposure and toxicity. Exposure may occur by ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact due to the presence of microplastics in products, foodstuff and air. In all biological systems, microplastic exposure may cause particle toxicity, with oxidative stress, inflammatory lesions and increased uptake or translocation. The inability of the immune system to remove synthetic particles may lead to chronic inflammation and increase risk of neoplasia. Furthermore, microplastics may release their constituents, adsorbed contaminants and pathogenic organisms. Nonetheless, knowledge on microplastic toxicity is still limited and largely influenced by exposure concentration, particle properties, adsorbed contaminants, tissues involved and individual susceptibility, requiring further research. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据