4.7 Article

Spatiotemporal analysis of anthropogenic phosphorus fluxes in China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 721, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137588

关键词

Material flow analysis; Phosphorus; Phosphorus utilization efficiency; Phosphorus water load

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41871212, 41871204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anthropogenic phosphorus supports food systems while have caused water pollution and posed challenges to the ecosystems. The increasing socioeconomic interactions between regions and systems have added more complexities to manage the sustainability of effective phosphorus use that requires joint analyses of multiple regions or multiple systems of phosphorus flow. This study builds a framework to systematically model the phosphorus fluxes in China based on material flow analysis. This model consists of phosphorus industrial system, agricultural planting system, rural residential system, urban residential system, large-scale livestock breeding system and household livestock breeding system. This study further explored the temporal and spatial characteristics of phosphorus fluxes in terms of phosphorus utilization efficiency and water load during 1995-2015. The results showed that the total amount of phosphorus input in China had increased nearly 1.78 times during 1995-2015, of which about 85% is used for fertilizer production. The phosphorus utilization rates of urban residential and large-scale livestock breeding systems remained low with a declining trend, dropping to 5%. The phosphorus water load peaked and declined during the study period. Among them, the phosphorus water load in large-scale and household livestock breeding systems accounted for more than 60% of the total. In spatial dimension, Southwest China is the region with the largest input of phosphorus, about 375.33 x 10(4) t, while Northeast China is the region with the largest phosphorus water load, about 28.06 x 10(4) t. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据