4.7 Article

CFD simulation of urban microclimate: Validation using high-resolution field measurements

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 695, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133743

关键词

Computational fluid dynamics; URANS; Heat wave; Climate change; Built environment

资金

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) [12M5319N]
  2. ANSYS CFD
  3. ERA-NET (Urban-Net Call)
  4. Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation [DeltaIEThetaNH/URBAN-NET/0308/02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat stress in urban areas can have detrimental effects on human health, comfort and productivity. In order to mitigate heat stress, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of urban microclimate are increasingly used. The validation of these simulations however requires high-quality experimental data to be compared with the simulation results. Due to lack of available high-resolution high-quality experimental data, CFD validation of urban microclimate for real urban areas is normally performed based on either a limited number of parameters measured at a limited number of points in space, or on experiments for idealized generic configurations. In this study, CFD simulations of urban microclimate arc performed for a dense highly heterogeneous district in Nicosia, Cyprus and validated using a high-resolution damsel of on-site measurements of air temperature, wind speed and surface temperature conducted for the same district area. The CFD simulations are performed based on the 3D Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations and the simulated period covers four consecutive days in July 2010. It is shown that the CFD simulations can predict air temperatures with an average absolute difference of 1.35 C, wind speed with an average absolute difference of 057 m/s and surface temperatures with an average absolute difference of 2.31 degrees C. Based on the comparative results, conclusions are made regarding the performance of URANS for the selected application and possible reasons for deviations between measured and simulated results are discussed. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据