4.7 Article

Experimental investigation and mathematical modeling of the competition among the fast-growing r-strategists and the slow-growing K-strategists ammonium-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitrification

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 702, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135049

关键词

Nitrification; Kinetic parameters; Affinity constant; Activated sludge morphology

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51478410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on their differences in the kinetic values, the nitrifiers could be classified into the fast-growing r-strategists and the slow-growing K-strategists bacteria. However, the difference in the kinetic values originated not only from the intrinsic differences among the nitrifier species, but also from other factors, i.e. sludge floc morphology, and the environment in which the nitrifiers were cultivated. It is not clear how these factors interact and affect the measured kinetic parameters and the competition among the r-strategists and the K-strategists bacteria. In this study, the kinetic parameters of nitrifiers cultivated in the SBR (sequencing batch reactor) under different substrate concentrations were monitored, together with the identification of nitrifier species and sludge floc morphology characterization. The results showed that the r-AOB and r-NOB (r-strategists ammonium-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, i.e., Nitrosomonas and Nitrospira) were the dominant nitrifiers in the SBR reactor. A mathematical model describing the competition between r/K AOB and NOB showed that r-AOB and r-NOB could be enriched in the SBR. The experimental investigation supported the model simulation results. The model simulation also revealed that the different r/K AOB and NOB species could be enriched in different DO concentrations and SRT conditions, which could be manipulated to promote the growth of r-AOB and NO2 accumulation for the autotrophic nitrogen removal using ANAMMX. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据