4.7 Article

Utilization of carbonate-based tailings to remove Pb(II) from wastewater through mechanical activation

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 698, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134270

关键词

Carbonate-based tailings; Lead removal; Calcite; Mechanical activation; Precipitation

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2018YFC1901502]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2018CFB468]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874220, 51904215, 51674183]
  5. China Scholarship Council [201806955006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The removal of lead in water and disposal of tailings are important environmental issues that need to be addressed urgently. This work explored the feasibility of utilizing the carbonate-based tailings (CBT) for removing lead from the simulated wastewater with the aid of wet stirred ball milling (mechanical activation). Batch experiments were performed to evaluate the influences of various experimental parameters like dosage of CBT, milling balls addition and initial concentration of lead. Under the action of mechanical activated CBT, the lead removal in the solution could reach more than 99% in 2 h, and the lead removal capacity reached 832 mg/g. The results of X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscope-Energy Dispersive Spectra (SEM-EDS) revealed that the calcite (CaCO3) in CBT played a major role in removing lead and the lead in the solution was transferred to the precipitate as cerussite (PbCO3). The mechanical activation promoted the dissolution of calcite, reduced the particle size of CBT and peeled off the lead carbonate precipitation on the surface of calcite, thereby enabling the reaction to be efficiently and thoroughly completed. The lead content in the precipitate after the reaction reached 38.4 wt%. which made it possible for lead recovery. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据