4.7 Article

Environmental sciences benefit from robust evidence irrespective of speed

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 696, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134000

关键词

Conservation; Policy; Open science; Reproducibility; Slow science movement

资金

  1. Environment and Climate Change Canada [GCXE19S058]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

y Discussions around the slow science movement abound in environmental sciences, yet they are generally counterproductive. Researchers must focus on producing robust and transparent knowledge, regardless of speed. Slow versus fast science is irrelevant - what we need is reproducible research to support evidence-based decision making and tackle urgent and costly environmental problems. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据