4.7 Article

Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes and bacteria from six atmospheric environments: Exposure risk to human

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 694, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133750

关键词

Airborne antibiotic resistance genes; Atmospheric environments; High-throughput sequencing; Correlation analysis; Exposure risk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), as an emerging environmental pollutant, have received widespread attention. There are many studies on ARGs in water and soil. However, there are few studies on airborne ARGs. We used qPCR to detect 19 ARG subtypes in six atmospheric environments. Among the different atmospheric environments including wastewater treatment plant (fine screens and sludge thickener), bathroom, laboratory, hospital and outdoor, the highest total concentration of ARGs is detected in the haze outdoor (9 x 10(5) copies/m(3)), while the lowest is in the bathroom atmosphere (4.2 x 10(4) copies/m(3)). Furthermore, beta-lactamARGs are found to be the dominant ARGs in these 6 atmospheric environments. Due to the large number and widespread use of antibiotics, the airborne ARGs in hospital have the highest diversity and equitability. The beta-lactamARGs are significantly positively correlated with sulfonamides ARGs, indicating the mechanism of co-resistance since these two ARGs may be on the same genetic elements and thus simultaneously exhibit both resistances. The network analysis provides potential host information between the airborne ARGs and the coexisted microbial taxa. Sphingomonas and Bradyhizoblum strains presumably host for tetracycline and beta-lactam ARGs, respectively. The ADDoutdoor of bla(TEM-1) was 7.8 x 10(5) copies/d/kg, more than the ADD (7.6 x 10(3) copies/d/kg) of bla(TEM-1) by drinking water. We can't ignore ARGs in the atmospheric environments. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据