4.8 Article

Kinetic pathways of ionic transport in fast-charging lithium titanate

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 367, 期 6481, 页码 1030-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aax3520

关键词

-

资金

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at the Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) [DE-SC0012704]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science facility [DE-SC0012704]
  3. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office, of the U.S. DOE
  4. Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program
  5. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE 1106400]
  6. U.S. DOE, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office [DE-SC0012704]
  7. U.S. DOE, Office of Basic Energy Science, Division of Materials Science and Engineering [DE-SC0012704]
  8. National Science Foundation's Extreme Science and Engineering Development Environment
  9. National Science Foundation [ACI-1548562]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fast-charging batteries typically use electrodes capable of accommodating lithium continuously by means of solid-solution transformation because they have few kinetic barriers apart from ionic diffusion. One exception is lithium titanate (Li4Ti5O12), an anode exhibiting extraordinary rate capability apparently inconsistent with its two-phase reaction and slow Li diffusion in both phases. Through real-time tracking of Li+ migration using operando electron energy-loss spectroscopy, we reveal that facile transport in Li4+xTi5O12 is enabled by kinetic pathways comprising distorted Li polyhedra in metastable intermediates along two-phase boundaries. Our work demonstrates that high-rate capability may be enabled by accessing the energy landscape above the ground state, which may have fundamentally different kinetic mechanisms from the ground-state macroscopic phases. This insight should present new opportunities in searching for high-rate electrode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据