4.5 Article

Effect of freeze-thaw on fatigue damage characteristics of cement emulsified bitumen mastic

期刊

ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1543-1558

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2019.1702584

关键词

CEBM; freeze-thaw; fatigue; damage; viscoelasticity

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1600100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51078114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that increasing freeze-thaw cycles decreases fatigue life of CEBM, while increasing both freeze-thaw damage and total fatigue damage. Increasing bitumen content improves frost resistance of CEBM and enhances sensitivity of fatigue properties to freeze-thaw cycles.
Cement emulsified bitumen mastic (simplified as CEBM) is a type of composite binder composed of cement, emulsified bitumen, water and various additives. Freeze-thaw cycles have an important influence on the fatigue properties of CEBM. In this paper, freeze-thaw test and fatigue test were carried out. Damage variable characterizing freeze-thaw effect and total damage variable characterizing freeze-thaw and fatigue coupling effect were established. They were based on the initial complex modulus and fatigue properties parameters of fatigue test. Effects of freeze-thaw cycles on fatigue properties and damage evolution process were analysed. This study demonstrates that, as freeze-thaw cycles increasing, fatigue life decreases, and the sensitivity of fatigue life with stress level is reduced. With the increase of freeze-thaw cycles, both freeze-thaw damage and total fatigue damage increase, and the proportion of freeze-thaw damage in total damage increases. Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on the fatigue properties of CEBM is enhanced. With the increase of bitumen content, freeze-thaw damage reduces and total damage increases. The increase of bitumen content can improve the frost resistance of CEBM and improve the sensitivity of fatigue properties to freeze-thaw cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据