4.5 Review

Enhancer RNAs in cancer: regulation, mechanisms and therapeutic potential

期刊

RNA BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 11, 页码 1550-1559

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1712895

关键词

Enhancers; enhancer RNAs; gene transcription regulation; noncoding RNAs; lncRNAs; chromatin looping; cancer; cancer diagnosis; prognosis; cancer therapy; RNA therapy; epigenetics; chromatin; RNA binding proteins

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP180734, RR160083]
  2. National Cancer Institute [K22CA204468]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R21GM132778]
  4. University of Texas [UT Rising STARs Award]
  5. Welch Foundation (US) [AU-2000-20190330]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhancers are distal genomic elements critical for gene regulation and cell identify control during development and diseases. Many human cancers were found to associate with enhancer malfunction, due to genetic and epigenetic alterations, which in some cases directly drive tumour growth. Conventionally, enhancers are known to provide DNA binding motifs to recruit transcription factors (TFs) and to control target genes. However, recent progress found that most, if not all, active enhancers pervasively transcribe noncoding RNAs that are referred to as enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). Increasing evidence points to functional roles of at least a subset of eRNAs in gene regulation in both normal and cancer cells, adding new insights into the action mechanisms of enhancers. eRNA expression was observed to be widespread but also specific to tumour types and individual patients, serving as opportunities to exploit them as potential diagnosis markers or therapeutic targets. In this review, we discuss the brief history of eRNA research, their functional mechanisms and importance in cancer gene regulation, as well as their therapeutic and diagnostic values in cancer. We propose that further studies of eRNAs in cancer will offer a promising 'eRNA targeted therapy' for human cancer intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据