4.7 Article

Phase 2 Study of Low-Dose Clofarabine Plus Cytarabine for Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Have Relapsed or Are Refractory to Hypomethylating Agents

期刊

CANCER
卷 123, 期 4, 页码 629-637

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30383

关键词

clofarabine; cytarabine; hypomethylating agents; myelodysplastic syndromes; treatment failure

类别

资金

  1. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center [CA016672]
  2. Edward P. Evans Foundation
  3. Fundacion Ramon Areces
  4. Kenneth B. McCredie Endowed Chair in Clinical Leukemia Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure is poor. This study evaluated the safety and activity of a combination of low-dose clofarabine and cytarabine for these patients. METHODS: Seventy patients with higher-risk MDS who had no response, progressed, or relapsed after at least 4 cycles of HMA therapy were treated. RESULTS: The median age was 72 years. Thirty-nine percent of the patients had high-risk disease according to the International Prognostic Scoring System, and 50% of the patients had poor-risk cytogenetics. Twenty-three percent of the patients had therapy-related MDS. The median number of prior cycles of HMA was 6 (range, 4-45). The overall response rate was 44%. The 6week mortality rate was 9%. Grade 3 and higher nonhematologic toxicities were rare, but infections occurred in 52% of the patients, and fever of unknown origin occurred in 33%. The median overall survival (OS) was 10 months (95% confidence interval, 1-37 months). Thirteen percent of the patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The responding patients had a median OS of 22 months, whereas the nonresponding patients had a median OS of 4 months. A complex karyotype was associated with worse response rates and OS. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of low-dose clofarabine and cytarabine is clinically active in these patients with few treatment options. (C) 2016 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据