4.0 Article

Is neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio a predictive factor for recurrence of urethral stricture?

期刊

REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA
卷 65, 期 12, 页码 1448-1453

出版社

ASSOC MEDICA BRASILEIRA
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.12.1448

关键词

Inflammation; Urethra/surgery; Recurrence; Urethral stricture; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male

向作者/读者索取更多资源

INTRODUCTION: Due to spongiofibrosis and inflammatory processes underlying the pathogenesis of urethral stricture, it is possible that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may give essential information about the course of the disease and recurrence possibilities. Our study aims to evaluate the correlation between NLR and recurrence rates. METHODS: A total of 512 patients who underwent direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) due to urethral stricture in our clinic between February 2010 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The median follow up for non-recurrent and recurrent groups after DVIU was 30 and 36 months, respectively. During the follow-up, 280 (54.7%) of the patients had recurrences, and 232 (45,3%) had no recurrences. The mean time for recurrence after DVIU was 6,5 +/- 1,4 months, with a range of 1-36 months. The mean NLR in the non-recurrence group was 2,02 +/- 0,87, with a median of 1.9, and 3,66 +/- 2,30, with a median of 3 in the recurrence group. A highly significant statistical difference was observed between two groups in terms of neutrophil count and NLR (p: 0.000 - both). The area under curve value for NLR was 0.767, with a standard error of 0.021 (95% CI 0.727-0.808). The cut-off value of NLR was determined as 2.25, with a 70% sensitivity and 67,7% specificity. CONCLUSION: By using NLR, the inflammatory features of the urethral tissue can be predicted, and possible recurrences after surgery can be estimated. Consequently, open urethroplasty techniques can be used in cases with a significant NLR value instead of the recurrent endoscopic procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据