4.5 Article

Bisphenol A and S impaired ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis

期刊

REPRODUCTION
卷 159, 期 5, 页码 571-583

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/REP-19-0575

关键词

-

资金

  1. INRAE, 'CentreVal de Loire' Region (Bemol project, APR IR 2017)
  2. French National Research Agency [ANR-18-CE34-0011-01 MAMBO]
  3. BioMedecine Agency [18AMP006 FertiPhenol]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-CE34-0011] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphenols, plasticisers used in food containers, can transfer to food. Bisphenol A (BPA) has been described as an endocrine disruptor and consequently banned from the food industry in several countries. It was replaced by a structural analogue, Bisphenol S (BPS). BPA action on the steroidogenesis is one of the mechanisms underlying its adverse effects on the efficiency of female reproduction. This study aimed to determine whether BPS is a safe alternative to BPA regarding GC functions. Antral follicles (2-6 mm), of approximatively 1000 adult ewe ovaries, were aspired and GC purified. For 48 h, ovine GC were treated with BPA or BPS (from 1 nM to 200 mu M) and the effects on cell viability, proliferation, steroid production, steroidogenic enzyme expression and signalling pathways were investigated. Dosages at and greater than 100 mu M BPA and 10 mu M BPS decreased progesterone secretion by 39% (P <0.001) and 22% (P=0.040), respectively. BPA and BPS 10 mu M and previously mentioned concentrations increased oestradiol secretion two-fold (P< 0.001 and P=0.082, respectively). Only 100 mu M BPA induced a decrease (P < 0.001) in gene expression of the enzymes of steroidogenesis involved in the production of progesterone. BPA reduced MAPK3/1 phosphorylation and ESR1 and ESR2 gene expression, effects that were not observed with BPS. BPA and BPS altered steroidogenesis of ovine GC. Thus, BPS does not appear to be a safe alternative for BPA. Further investigations are required to elucidate BPA and BPS mechanisms of action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据