4.7 Article

Flow sculpting enabled anaerobic digester for energy recovery from low-solid content waste

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 841-848

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.071

关键词

Anaerobic digester; Plug flow reactor; Low-solid-content wastewater; Food waste; Computational fluid dynamics

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific Research, Lebanon (CNRS-L), under the Grant Research Program (GRP)
  2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Washington, DC, through the Arab-American Frontiers Fellowship Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditionally, energy recovery from low-solid-content wastes occurs in Continuously Stirred Tank Reactors, whereas Plug Flow Reactors (PFR) are used to treat high-solid-content wastes. In comparison, this study uses a special configuration of anaerobic PFR (AnPFR), consisting of a coiled tubular structure, for energy recovery from a mixture of Food Waste and Wastewater, fed at a loading rate of 3 gVS.L-1.d(-1) and a solids content of 2.5%. The AnPFR was upgraded into a Flow Sculpting enabled Anaerobic Digester (FSAD), an innovative plug flow design relying on flow sculpting via a sequence of pillars to provide passive mixing. The purpose of the FSAD design is to optimize operational performance while maintaining minimum mixing energy requirements. Computational fluid dynamics simulations revealed that pillars induce local vorticity in the fluid and contribute to the inertial deformation of the flow to enhance mixing. Coherently, experimental results proved that upgrading the AnPFR to FSAD resulted in a better stability (VFA dropped from 4433 to 2034 mg L-1) and a higher efficiency (removal efficiencies of COD and volatile solids increased from 75% to 77%-88% and 91%, respectively). Equally important, the methane yield, indicative of energy generation potential, increased from 181 L kg VSfed-1 to 291 L kg VSfed-1. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据