4.7 Article

Hybrid support vector machines with heuristic algorithms for prediction of daily diffuse solar radiation in air-polluted regions

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 2034-2045

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.104

关键词

Air pollution; Support vector machines; Extreme gradient boosting; Particle swarm optimization algorithm; Bat algorithm; Whale optimization algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51879226, 51709143]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China [20181BAB206045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing air pollutants significantly affect the proportion of diffuse (R-d) to global (R-s) solar radiation. This study proposed three new hybrid support vector machines (SVM) with particle swarm optimization algorithm (SVM-PSO), bat algorithm (SVM-BAT) and whale optimization algorithm (SVM-WOA) for predicting daily R-d in air-polluted regions. These models were further compared to standalone SVM, multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models. The results showed that models with suspended particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 mu m and 10 mu m (PM2.5 and PM10) and ozone (O-3) produced more accurate daily R-d estimates than those without air pollution parameters, with average relative decreases in root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 11.1%, 10.0% and 10.4% for sunshine duration-based, R-s-based and combined models, respectively. SVM showed better accuracy than XGBoost and MARS. However, compared to SVM, SVM-BAT further enhanced the prediction accuracy and convergence rate in daily R-d modeling, followed by SVM-WOA and SVM-PSO, with relative decreases in RMSD of 2.9%-5.6%, 1.9%-4.9% and 1.1%-3.3%, respectively. The results highlighted the significance of incorporating air pollutants for more accurate estimation of daily R-d in air-polluted regions. Heuristic algorithms, especially BAT, are highly recommended for improving performance of standalone machine learning models. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据