4.7 Article

Integrating urban form and distributed energy systems: Assessment of sustainable development scenarios for a Swiss village to 2050

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 810-826

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.033

关键词

Urban form; Densification; Urban energy system; Energy hub; Sustainable development; Energy transition

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [P300P2 174514]
  2. EPFL Middle East
  3. Swiss Innovation Agency Innosuisse
  4. Swiss International School of Dubai (SISD)
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300P2_174514] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integration of renewable energy in the built environment, improving the energy efficiency of buildings, and optimizing distributed energy systems are three interconnected activities that are central for the transition to sustainable cities. Here, a methodology is developed to quantify not only these three activities simultaneously but also link them to the urban form. Two development scenarios (densification and expansion) are proposed for the village Hemberg in Switzerland for the years 2030 and 2050. The results show that, with reference to 2017, global warming increases the cooling demand of the buildings by 70% in 2030 and by 115% in 2050. The results also suggest that renovation is the key element for the future energy management and efficiency improvement in Hemberg because the building insulation has much greater effect on the energy demand than the urban form. Furthermore, the results suggest that a grid-integrated energy hub consisting of wind turbines and PV panels can supply 77% of the annual energy demand in 2050. Also, urban form has great effects on building-integrated PV generation and, in general, on the integration of renewable technologies. The results contribute to efficient energy planning and policy-making for the future energy transition in Hemberg. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据